Publicity and openness turn research into science. Science communication is about passing on information and interaction within the scientific community and outside it. Science communication is not merely about communicating research findings. Responsible science communication increases confidence in scientific knowledge. Scientific publication is an important way for researchers to gain credit and therefore it is important that authorship is defined so as to fairly reward researchers.
Publishing
Recent articles
19.5.2018
In peer review of scholarly manuscripts, authors, editors, and expert reviewers share responsibility for the success of the process.
19.5.2018
For scientists, social media opens up a new way to participate in global and national discussions and to share information.
19.5.2018
Predatory publishers charge a fee from authors but fail to perform the duties of an academic publisher.
19.5.2018
The peer-review label in a publication shows that the text has been peer reviewed in line with generally accepted quality and ethical requirements.
19.5.2018
Scientific and artistic creativity are regulated in different ways.
19.5.2018
What is open co-authorship of scientific articles and how is authorship defined in such cases?
17.5.2018
There are many kinds of science communication for many audiences.
17.5.2018
Not all science communication is a high-speed performance. Slow tools are needed too.
17.5.2018
Both professions intertwine analysis of the reasons and the consequences of things, fuelled by a natural sense of curiosity.
16.5.2018
The Science Forum is vital for bringing together scientists and the general public and as an opportunity to ask questions.
16.5.2018
ORCID provides each researcher with their own unique ID code, which helps to clearly determine the researcher’s authorship.
15.3.2018
The Finnish Copyright Act (404/1961) (with amendments) emphasises protection of the form of a work, not its content or idea as such.