Publicity and openness turn research into science. Science communication is about passing on information and interaction within the scientific community and outside it. Science communication is not merely about communicating research findings. Responsible science communication increases confidence in scientific knowledge. Scientific publication is an important way for researchers to gain credit and therefore it is important that authorship is defined so as to fairly reward researchers.
Publishing
Recent articles
5.8.2019
The purpose of open peer review is to improve scientific communication and publishing practices.
29.7.2019
Commonness of article-based dissertations means that universities need more competence related to publishing practices and copyright.
19.5.2019
Publication Forum (JUFO) is a classification system to support the quality assessment of research output.
29.11.2018
The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK recommends agreeing on the principles of authorship in good time to prevent disputes.
4.9.2018
Photographic works previously on public display raised an ethical dilemma between the clashing demands of copyright and privacy protection.
24.8.2018
In commissioned research, the interests of the scientific community and the business world may pull in different directions, and it is vital to agree on these in advance.
24.8.2018
In science publishing, questions relating to authorship may once more become a topic of debate.
12.7.2018
Links to guidelines and codes for responsible publishing.
28.6.2018
Checklist helps participants in a research project to agree on authorship at every stage of the research.
27.6.2018
The researcher’s professionalism demands responsible behaviour throughout – also when communicating – the research.
23.5.2018
Encountering and preventing hate speech is an occupational safety and health issue.
19.5.2018
Science centres invite their visitors to engage and learn by doing.